deb-ski.com Deborah Gibson fan forum
May 24, 2012, 05:47:20 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: SMF - Just Installed!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Disney will stop producing fairy tale based movies  (Read 501 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Woops
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +10/-11
Online Online

Posts: 3,466


View Profile
« on: November 21, 2010, 04:19:50 PM »

source


And "Tangled" hasn't been released yet. Though personally, they already screwed-up by changing it's name, which was originally titled "Rapunzel" and having it CGI. The upcoming Winnie the Pooh movie will be traditionally drawn...

Personally there hasn't been a good Disney movie (without Pixar) since "The Lion King" and the company is only "Disney" by name.


Quote
Disney: No More Animated Fairy Tale Animated Features
By Ed Liu
11-21-2010, 10:06 AM


The Los Angeles Times reports that after this Wednesday's release of Tangled, the Walt Disney Corporation will not be producing any new films based on fairy-tales "for the foreseeable future." The move is the latest in a series of decisions ranging from the cancellation of The Snow Queen and Jack and the Beanstalk feature films to retitling Rapunzel to Tangled and shifting its marketing focus on the princess to the male lead, Flynn Rider. Pixar Animation Studios president Ed Catmull states that fairy-tale movies "may come back later because someone has a fresh take on it," but states that he and Disney Chief Creative Officer John Lasseter are encouraging less formula and more creativity, adding, "If you say to somebody, 'You should be doing fairy tales,' it's like saying, 'Don't be risky.'" The studio's aim will be to make movies with more universal appeal over the "princess movie" target audience of little girls.

The article also notes changing trends, such as veteran producer Bonnie Arnold (How to Train Your Dragon) noting that their real competition is movies like Iron Man and Transformers, and the loss of traction the "Princesses" concept has had in the wake of toys like the Bratz dolls and, ironically, fare like Disney's own girl-centric tweencoms.

Logged

Woops
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +10/-11
Online Online

Posts: 3,466


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2010, 04:32:27 PM »

excerpts from LA Times article


Quote
Disney instructed Menken to depart from the heavy Broadway musical-type scoring he made famous in "The Little Mermaid" and "Beauty and the Beast." So the composer borrowed from leaner singer-songwriters of the late 1960s, including Joni Mitchell.

"It's more like handmade music rather than too over-produced," Howard said. "You'll hear a lot of guitar music, especially when Rapunzel is singing.... That was a nice way to break away from what [Menken] had done."

Not into  musicals, but haven't several  Disney movies became successful shows on Broadway. Though noticed a trend in animated movies, which they mostly feature more contemporary pop songs.

Also can't picture characters from the medieval setting acting out as 20th century rock/pop musicians without looking like a parody or "Shrek".


Quote
Over the decades, Disney has benefited from the ticket sales and licensing revenue generated by such princess-driven properties as "The Little Mermaid," "Beauty and the Beast" and "Aladdin." The studio's most recent offering, however, was a clear disappointment. Although critically acclaimed, last year's "The Princess and the Frog" was the most poorly performing of Disney's recent fairy tales.

In the age of mega-franchises when movies need to appeal to a broad audience to justify a sizable investment, Disney discovered too late that "Princess and the Frog" appealed to too narrow an audience: little girls. This prompted the studio to change the name of its Rapunzel movie to the gender-neutral "Tangled" and shift the lens of its marketing to the film's swashbuckling male costar, Flynn Rider.

"Princess & The Frog" wasn't a major flop and it was even nominated for an Oscar. Overhyped mega-franchises doesn't mean... then again Disney is a mega-corperation.
Logged

Out of the Blue
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +5/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,683


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2010, 04:37:38 PM »

Disney not making fairy tale based movies is like Sears dropping their catalog.
Logged
Woops
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +10/-11
Online Online

Posts: 3,466


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2010, 06:51:24 AM »

According to Disney's Facebook it's false.


source

Quote
Originally Posted by Daikun  
Ignore it, people. According to Disney's Facebook page, it's a false alarm.

That's a huge relief. I wonder how the LA Times article got published, if the information was incorrect, and what their prime source was. Just a misunderstanding I suppose. I'm just happy that Disney isn't giving up on Fairy Tales.



added: nothing at Cartoon Brew (which is a reliable source) and the rumor had (obiviously) spread at Ultimate Disney

I'll wait 'til there's official word from a press release.


From the DVDizzy/Ultimate Disney forum
Quote
This is certainly not the first time Disney has taken a break from fairy tales. They had to for their package features during the 1940's. Their most famous break was from 1959 to 1989, thanks to the initial underperformance of Sleeping Beauty and the shrinking animation market during that period. Their last break was in an attempt to build up on the success of their Renaissance movies without repeating every single step. Really, their recent challenge to find a broader audience has been going on for at least the past decade.


interesting, though there was "Winnie the Pooh". "The Jungle Book" & "Sword In The Stone (plus a few others).  While not fairy tales (well, "Sword In The Stone" maybe), they're based on exisiting stories.
« Last Edit: November 22, 2010, 06:56:59 AM by Woops » Logged

Out of the Blue
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +5/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,683


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2010, 03:25:17 PM »

If it is true it will be one of the worst decisions that a major company has ever made and Disney will pay a very heavy price for it in the years to come.
Logged
Woops
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +10/-11
Online Online

Posts: 3,466


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 23, 2010, 04:31:31 AM »

The Facebook comment was official, which was from Disney/Pixar Animation president Ed Catmull

Quote
A headline in today’s LA Times erroneously reported that the Disney fairy tale is a thing of the past, but I feel it is important to set the record straight that they are alive and well at Disney and continue this week with Tangled, a contemporary retelling of a much loved story. We have a number of projects in development with new twists that audiences will be able to enjoy for many years to come. – Ed Catmull
Logged

Out of the Blue
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +5/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,683


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2011, 03:26:48 PM »

Wasn't "Beauty and the Beast" the first Disney movie to use CGI?
Logged
Woops
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +10/-11
Online Online

Posts: 3,466


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 01, 2011, 06:40:48 AM »

Actually "The Little Mermaid"
Logged

Out of the Blue
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +5/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,683


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 02, 2011, 03:47:49 PM »

Did it use it all the way through or just in parts?
Logged
Woops
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +10/-11
Online Online

Posts: 3,466


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 03, 2011, 01:10:02 AM »

in parts

Technically, majority of animation is done on computers for about 20 years.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2011, 01:11:44 AM by Woops » Logged

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!